Asbestos Hazards Handbook - Chapter 8
 Contents    Search publications                      Previous chapter   Next chapter

The Fatal Legacy: Waste and Contamination

The asbestos problem is not restricted to the backstreet strip-it-and-tip-it merchants. In January 1995 Rolls Royce Nuclear Engineering Services Limited was fined £15,000 with £350 costs by Wolverhampton magistrates after pleading guilty to breaches of asbestos laws. A car park had been extensively contaminated with asbestos. A skip loaded with waste asbestos insulation material made a 40-mile round trip from Wolverhampton to Telford releasing fibres all the way. Two unlicensed cowboys were allowed to strip brown asbestos from old pipework.

Waste disposal can be the weakest link in the legal chain involving the removal of asbestos from buildings. There is less legal control and few inspectors available. It is illegal to dump asbestos in anything other than official licensed sites. Restrictions are greater for some types of waste than others (when asbestos content is greater than 1%).

The legal framework

Asbestos waste is covered by the Control of Pollution (Special Wastes) Regulations 1980. Asbestos removal contractors must have documentary proof they are dumping at a licensed site. Work should not go ahead unless the documents can be produced. Otherwise, the Waste Regulation Agency (Environmental Agency after 1st April 1996) and the local council's Environmental Health Department should be contacted.

Controlling asbestos waste on site

CHECKLIST

In order to deal with asbestos waste safely, the contractor should:

a) remove asbestos waste at least once a shift and seal and clean the containers

b) separate fibrous and dusty asbestos waste from other material

c) put asbestos waste in suitable containers: the bare minimum is double bagging in 500-1000 gauge polythene bags, the outer bag being marked DANGER: ASBESTOS - CANCER HAZARD! For most asbestos removal jobs the contractor should provide a lockable sealed skip which is within a secure removal compound

d) not break up or cut large pieces

e) check that the site can handle drums or rigid containers

f) label containers in accordance with relevant legislation, the Control of Asbestos at Work Regulations 1987, the Classification, Packaging, Labelling of Dangerous Substances Regulations 1984, the Dangerous Substances (Conveyance by Road in Road Tankers and Tank Containers) Regulations 1981, and the Road Traffic (Carriage of Dangerous Substances in Packages etc) Regulations 1986

g) label any blue asbestos DANGER: CONTAINS CROCIDOLITE/BLUE ASBESTOS

h) avoid outside storage; a warehouse or other temporary site should be found. If outside storage is unavoidable the asbestos containers should be protected by a tarpaulin or other suitable covering.

Removal of asbestos waste from the site

CHECKLIST

The following conditions should be observed to enable the safe removal of asbestos waste:

a) the local Waste Regulation Authority (from 1st April 1996 the Environmental Agency) should be consulted to check the final disposal site can deal with asbestos

b) most asbestos waste is carried by road. The Regulations listed under f) above apply. Key questions are: Are the lorries sealed, lined with rubber and wetted down? When the lorries leave the site have they been washed down? Are the lorries carrying waste labelled? The Regulations are supported by Codes of Practice which give details of procedure

c) asbestos waste should be removed during normal working hours or special permission sought to do it at other times

£28,000 fine: asbestos strewn about the site

Four members of the Smart family, all in business together, were each fined £7,000 in a Bristol Magistrates Court in March 1995, for failing to comply with an abatement notice served by Bristol Environmental Health Department requiring them to employ a specialist firm to remove asbestos from an old site. Inspectors discovered broken pieces of asbestos concrete sheet roofing strewn about the site when they visited it last December. The factory also contained asbestos lagging. A notice was served under Section 80 of the Environmental Protection Act which requires them to use a licensed contractor. They were required to: control the release of dust; or to remove and dispose of all the demolished materials which might contain asbestos. Roy Edwin Hill is to be prosecuted separately by the HSE for allegedly carrying out demolition work without a license.

Danger areas

Fly tipping

On many waste sites vast piles of rubbish are deposited by fly tippers and often ordinary looking building sites contain lethal piles of asbestos. Recent prosecutions have occurred where asbestos has been placed in dustbins outside nearby housing. Someone dumped 1.5 tonnes of asbestos by the village pond in South Ferriby.

Demolition of old factories, tower blocks, and power stations

Demolition is a particularly high risk activity. Two US studies published in January 1995 indicate the high risk to demolition workers. The first showed employers on demolition jobs did not provide protective equipment and failed to require simple procedures to protect workers against large dust exposures. No surprises there. The second study, involving health checks on 88 workers, each with at least 20 years experience in demolition, showed evidence of asbestos-related disease evident on X-rays among about 20% of those examined.

Most buildings will have some asbestos which will contaminate schools, homes and all the surrounding area if it is not removed in a controlled fashion BEFORE demolition.

In the past, campaign groups have had to protest and organise locally before the HSE and other authorities have take the risks of demolition work seriously.

When Fulham Power Station was to be demolished, local residents formed TERROR, an outspoken action group aimed at forcing the authorities to respond to their problems. Air tests showed high levels of fibre release from the site. The HSE issued a Prohibition Notice to stop work.

The Government introduced new measures to compel the Central Electricity Generating Board to remove all asbestos from disused power stations before sale and to supervise removal as a result of this campaign. At the time there were 24 more stations to be disposed of, so this was an important victory.

CHECKLIST

a) Has the site been surveyed and samples taken and analysed (HSE Guidance note on demolition GS29)?

b) Have specialist contractors been employed? No-one else should deal with asbestos waste (see Monitoring Contractors)

Waste disposal sites near homes and schools

This is a relatively new area of public concern. Often people become suspicious because of endless dusty, noisy lorries which pass through residential areas. Communities have expressed fears about the effects of waste disposal. The House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology concluded, "clearly a significant part of the waste disposal industry is cutting corners... and not all waste authorities are fulfilling their obligations to protect the public"

CHECKLIST

a) Find out exactly what is being dumped, demand to see a copy of the licence in full and check to see if it has been amended or could be amended. Demand that any amendments go through a council committee.

b) Is the tip securely fenced?

c) Is monitoring being carried out frequently by the contractor and by the local authority at appropriate places on site? It should be done close to the tipping face.

d) Are the workers wearing protective equipment when dealing with unbagged waste?

e) Who are the contractors? Who are the sub-contractors? Have they informed the Hazardous Waste Inspectorate of their business and have they been inspected?

Landfill

Most asbestos waste is dumped in landfill sites. The Institute of Waste Management (in their Code of Practice for the Disposal of Asbestos Waste) are concerned about the subsequent disturbance of asbestos in landfill sites if sites are developed at a later date.

CHECKLIST

a) Has the site been prepared to receive asbestos waste?

b) Is the asbestos waste being covered over with a minimum of two metres of soil at the end of every day?

c) Is the waste being dumped in bags? Are the bags strong and secure and clearly marked?

Redevelopment of former industrial or waste disposal sites

Asbestos is a hazard to health for people and grazing animals when still on the surface or when buried beneath abandoned industrial sites and other types of derelict and unused land. Action may have to be taken by the land owner/developer, land users or local authorities to reduce the risk. According to the Loss Prevention Council reclamation and re-use of such land can be difficult and their publication Asbestos Use in Buildings gives details of how to investigate sites and gives some information about remedial action which may need to be taken.

The HSE and the local Environmental Health Departments will need to be involved. Remedial action will be costly and could involve:

    excavation, removal and disposal elsewhere excavation, then re-burial on site at greater depth covering the contaminated area with inert material or permanent hard cover

Sites that may contain asbestos

    Railway land: large workshops, depots, sidings Shipbuilders, ship repairers, ship breakers' yards Other heavy engineering sites Old waste disposal sites, especially those predating current legislation (1976) Asbestos manufacturers Power stations Scrap yards

 Source: Loss Prevention Council 1993

Fires and strange snow

In September 1994 the empty British Leather tanning factory in Birkenhead, Merseyside, was set alight and blazed out of control for hours, resulting in a wide area being covered with asbestos dust and debris. Pieces of asbestos from the old corrugated roof were found among the ashes. Soot showered the neighborhood making it look as though it had snowed. After tests on the debris prompted by a worried resident, the Council eventually issued warnings to residents. Council staff toured the area with loud hailers telling people not to clear up the area themselves. Many had already cleaned cars and window sills, some did not hear the warnings and children had played in the dust.

A debate followed in the tightly knit community. The local Environmental Health Department stated that the risk from a single day's exposure was negligible and that the only danger from asbestos was from longterm exposure in the workplace. Local campaigners, led by Wirral TUC, involved solicitors and other experts who argued that any risk was unacceptable because it could have been avoided. They were especially concerned because children's lives had been put at risk. They claimed the factory owners were negligent in not removing the asbestos from a building at risk of arson and that the Council failed to warn residents in time. Legal aid has been granted for a detailed investigation into the incident and the campaigners are collecting names and statements of those affected. They want better emergency procedures and asbestos in disused buildings to be identified and removed to prevent further catastrophes.

A one-off exposure in Rotherham also demonstrates the risks for the public when asbestos is not properly controlled. In summer 1995, part of the town was covered in a fine dust which proved to be white asbestos. Again warnings not to clean it up were given only after some residents had already done so. The source of the dust was unknown. In Rotherham, as in Birkenhead, the public were told the risks to their health were low.

Fires involving large releases of asbestos have occurred in Sheffield and at Brent Cross in London. All highlight the fact that as long as asbestos remains in buildings people will be at risk.


Asbestos Hazards Handbook - Chapter 8
© 1995 London Hazards Centre, Interchange Studios, Hampstead Town Hall Centre, 213 Haverstock Hill, London NW3 4QP, UK

Contents   Search publications   Previous chapter   Next chapter