HARD LABOUR - Part 3 - section 3
Contents
Search Publications
Previous chapter
Next chapter
Stress prevention policiesThe EC goes on to lay down the following principles for designing a stress prevention strategy at the workplace. EU Principles of stress preventionJust as there are many causes, so there is no unique cure for stress. Several principles are important, however in designing a stress prevention strategy at the workplace: Prevention through improved designAction must start at the design stage. Facilities, equipment, machinery and tools have to be planned having in mind the potential health impact. Company buying policies need to consider their future impact on employees' wellbeing. Participation of end usersTechnocratic approaches should be avoided. Joint initiatives of managers workers and professionals are the key to success, and top-down management strategies should be replaced by an involvement approach. Better work organisationThis means greater control and autonomy by workers over their tasks, less monotonous and repetitive jobs with greater social interaction and workgroup support. A holistic approach to the environmentBoth the physical and the social environments should be integrated, while both the working and living environments should also be considered as one in terms of their effects on occupational stress. An enabling organisational cultureA healthy company should be measured by the quality of working life for its workforce and not only by economic values. The benefits from such an approach should be gauged in the medium and long term, not in the short term. Attention to workers with special needsSuch as shift workers, migrant workers, older and young workers. The gender dimension also needs to be taken into account. Economic feasibilityEconomic feasibility of the prevention strategy will provide support for the policies and will increase the chance of success and commitment by the organisation (Hygeia 1992). FIET recommendations on limitation of work-related stress and pressure affecting salaried employeesThe International Federation of Commercial, Clerical, Professional, and Technical Employees (FIET) made the following points in 1992 on formulating a policy on occupational stress: To FIET's recommendations we would add the following points: With stress becoming increasingly recognised at a priority health and safety issue for trade unions, as well as producing guidance for members (see Part 4, Contact and resources), several UK trade unions have passed conference motions on tackling stress at work. Examples of motions from a civil service union and a teachers' union are given in the box below. "Conference believes that prevention of work-related stress is a priority. We note that the Health and Safety Executive are committed to issuing Guidance to Employers on the issue which whilst welcomed is not enough. Conference instructs the National Executive Committee to:
"Conference congratulates those local authorities which have recognised the detrimental effects of the increasing incidence of stress-related illness amongst teachers, and have attempted to tackle the issue positively. However, Conference notes with alarm the increasing levels of occupational stress in teaching and recognises that major contributory factors include:
Conference calls upon all LEAs, governing bodies and school managements to accept their responsibility for the health, safety and welfare of their workforce and demands the adoption of management styles which promote a healthy and stress-free working environment. Conference pledges full support to sick members and calls upon local and negotiating secretaries and health and safety co-ordinators to continue discussions with the relevant bodies with a view to the creation and adoption of stress at work policy statements which start by addressing the causes of stress in teaching before suggesting measures intended merely to ameliorate the condition." (NASUWT 1994). Selected recommendations of APA/NIOSH panel on work design and stress 1992Control Uncertainty Conflict Task/job demands Amendments to Swedish Working Environment Act 1991(To include psycho-social hazards in work organisation) Hard Labour Part 3 - section 3 © 1994 London Hazards Centre, Interchange Studios, Hampstead Town Hall Centre, 213 Haverstock Hill, London NW3 4QP, UK Table of contents Search Publications Previous chapter/section Next chapter/section |