|
London Hazards Centre Factsheet
Safety management: employer duties and employee rights A common problem faced by safety reps is getting management to carry out their legal duties. The lack of a sound safety management system leads safety matters to be ignored or dealt with in an unacceptably ad-hoc fashion and allows managers to pass the buck or explain away health and safety failures. The first part of this factsheet briefly describes the key elements of a proper safety management system. Safety reps should check what is going on in their workplace against the management duties listed below and they should use their rights to pressure managers into taking a structured approach to improving health and safety in the workplace and developing a good health and safety "culture". The second part of the factsheet looks at safety reps rights to be informed and consulted about the safety management system and how they might put pressure on reluctant managers. Management DutiesThe Health and Safety At Work Act (HASAWA) 1974 says that: "It shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees". More recently, Regulation 4 of the Management of Health and Safety at Work (MHSW) Regulations 1992 lays down that every employer shall make arrangements for the "effective planning, organisation, control, monitoring and review of the preventive and protective measures". Safety PolicyThe starting point of a sound system is the health and safety
policy. Section 2(3) of HASAWA requires every organisation with
five or more employees to have a written health and safety
policy. Smaller organisations should also adopt good practice and
accept the need for a written policy as well. A safety policy
should:
Organisation and planning
Companies and organisations have to design and establish systems
and allocate responsibilities. Managers must:
Individuals at all levels of management have to be made responsible and accountable for the control and implementation of policy. The organisation must make sure that these people are competent and are given training and access to information and advice appropriate to the extent of the responsibility and the level of risk involved. Risk AssessmentsRegulation 3 of MHSW lays down that every employer shall assess the risks to the health and safety of his employees to which they are exposed at work. Where the employer employs five or more people, the significant findings of the assessment must be written down. When conducted properly, risk assessments can facilitate a structured approach to identifying risks and determining control measures. Standard forms are normally used to achieve thoroughness and consistency. Official guidance often includes suggested standard formats, though these can be modified to suit particular needs and risk levels. Risk assessments may be thematic (e.g. stress, violence, manual handling), task-centred (e.g. keyboarding, cleaning, driving) or relate to particular aspects of the working environment (e.g. hot working conditions). Task-centred assessments can be generic (i.e. apply to all situations) or focus on a particular piece of equipment or job. They should record the people at risk; minimum legal standards; existing control measures and the need for further action. Workers must be consulted as part of the risk assessment. They will often know the hazards and risks of their jobs better than anybody else. MonitoringTwo types of monitoring system must be implemented: 1. Active systems which monitor the achievement of objectives and the extent of compliance with standards. Regular and carefully conducted inspections, covering one or all parts of the premises or one specific work activity (e.g. keyboarding or manual handling), provide information essential for conducting risk assessments, verifying whether plans are being implemented and objectives achieved. A written record must be taken, circulated to others with specific health and safety responsibility and made available to employees. 2. Reactive systems which monitor accidents, ill-health, incidents and other evidence of deficient health and safety performance. Recording and reporting systems and subsequent investigations are important elements of a good monitoring system. All accidents and near-misses must be recorded in an accident book. Employees should be encouraged to record such events and they have the right to record accidents in the terms they see fit. ReviewAll health and safety management systems need regular review. Changes in the law, production systems or working methods should all trigger an evaluation of existing arrangements. In addition a periodic review of the whole system should take place. An annual review would be appropriate in most cases. An independent audit should take place at less regular intervals. An independent assessment of the validity and reliability of management planning and control systems may help to avoid complacency on the part of those managing the system and provide welcome input on how improvements could be made. SAFETY REPS' RIGHTSVarious laws give worker representatives the right to influence the safety management system and acquire the information they need for that purpose. Section 2(6) of HASAWA gives consultation and information rights to elected safety reps in workplaces where the employer officially recognises a trade union. The Safety Representatives and Safety Committees (SRSC) Regulations give safety reps the right to see and copy any information held by the employer that relates to health, safety and welfare (unless it identifies a particular member of staff), including risk assessments, safety policy, fire certificate, accident book and information on proposed changes that might affect the health and safety of members The MHSW Regulations 1992 extended safety reps' rights by
laying down that employers must consult with safety reps "in good
time" as to:
The Health and Safety (Consultation with Employees) Regulations 1996 afford consultation and information rights to workers and their representatives in workplaces where a trade union is not officially recognised by the employer. What if managers do not co-operate?Managers often ignore safety reps and, in many cases, actively
seek to limit their activities and influence. Others are simply
ignorant about their legal duties. Depending on the degree of
resistance from management, safety reps should:
June 1997 © London Hazards Centre, Interchange Studios, Hampstead Town Hall Centre, 213 Haverstock Hill, London NW3 4QP, UK (T) +44-(0)20-7794-5999 (F) +44-(0)20-7794-4702 (E) mail@lhc.org.uk |
Home page |